RevRise Pursuit Scorecard
Answer each question based on what you actually know — not what you hope is true. Ratings and your overall recommendation update in real time.
Every pursuit carries a cost. The objective of this assessment is to determine whether this opportunity deserves additional investment — or whether it may become a Pursuit Tax.
Answer each question honestly based on what you actually know. Avoid assumptions, optimism, and internal narratives. If you don't know the answer, select "Unknown." Unknowns reveal where further client validation is needed before committing more time and resources.
Section ratings appear after each section is fully completed. Your overall recommendation updates automatically as you work through the scorecard.
Remember: qualification is not about proving a pursuit is winnable. It's about determining whether it is worth pursuing at all.
Work through the sections below. Your pursuit recommendation will appear here.
Yes = Strong position · Partially = Gaps exist · No = Weakness · Unknown = Blind spot
This section is optional and not scored. Add stakeholders as you identify them throughout the pursuit — one contact on day one, a full map by proposal stage. Use it to inform your answers in Sections 5 and 6.
- Do their stated priorities truly drive decisions and behavior — or are they mostly messaging?
- Are those priorities reflected in what they measure, fund, and reward?
- Have you validated your understanding externally (customers, analysts, partners, public sources)?
- Can you link this opportunity to relevant industry trends and the client's KPIs?
- Are any KPI shortfalls symptoms of deeper (dormant) pain you can address?
- Are requirements clearly defined — and do you understand the business drivers behind them?
- Can you ethically and credibly reframe the issues in your favor?
- Do you know how the client views you relative to your competitors?
- Are you doing work for any of the client's customers, competitors, or business partners — giving you an edge?
- Have you clearly defined your winning strategy and how the competitor will try to neutralize it?
- Do your strategic benefits tie directly to the critical business issues you've identified?
- Are you proposing what the client says they want — or what they truly need?
- Have you identified potential showstoppers and assessed mutual fit (methodology, price, culture)?
- Do you have a mitigation plan for what could cause your strategy to fail?
- Do you understand what the client is trying to accomplish and how you specifically fit?
- Is this what senior management is focused on — and have you verified it directly?
- Do you understand the full impact of inaction on their business — financial, operational, reputational?
- Is there a specific impending event, deadline, or risk driving action now?
- Have you confirmed the source of urgency with someone who has real decision-making power?
- Do you know what could cause the urgency to change, fade, or disappear?
- Do you have a confident estimate of value, discount, and scope?
- Is the project budgeted — or can funding be secured, and by whom?
- Is the business problem large enough to motivate the client to act and fund a solution?
- Is your sales cycle in sync with their buying cycle — and do you know when they will decide?
- Is deal momentum increasing — and does the process advantage you over competitors?
- Is this initiative protected from competing priorities, budget shifts, or timeline delays?
- Have you spoken with people across the client organization — beyond your immediate contacts?
- Do you know who will personally benefit from the outcomes you are proposing?
- Do you have a power sponsor — politically astute, with the influence to drive the decision?
- Who is giving you inside information, and have you confirmed it with multiple independent sources?
- Do you know who supports your competitors — and why?
- Do you have a strategy for managing competitor supporters?
- Do the benefits you're proposing tie directly to the agendas of the most powerful stakeholders?
- If the client had to vote today — would you win or lose, and do you know why?
- Is there a defined decision-making process, and do you know what phase they're in?
- Do you know what could change the decision process — and who else could become involved?
- If the process turns political (The Crucible), do you know what will happen and how you'll respond?
- Have you identified everyone with major pain or power who you haven't yet called on?
- Do you have a clear pursuit strategy — and have you stress-tested it against the competitive landscape?
- Do you have a plan to gain and document a clear client commitment at each stage?
- Do you have the right people and resources to execute your strategy?
- Are your tactics consistent with your strategy — or are you reacting to the client's agenda?
- Do your action plans directly address the major blind spots identified in this scorecard?
The Canyon & The Crucible
Two critical, high-pressure phases in complex competitive evaluations where deals most often fail — due to political misalignment, information gaps, or buyer indecision.
The Canyon — The Information Gap
- Momentum loss: early excitement fades and the deal enters a limbo state where stakeholders lose focus
- Political disconnect: the sale stalls when the team relies on a funnel instead of understanding the internal champion's political power
- Probability trap: pipelines may show 10–20% probability, but if momentum hasn't crossed a threshold, true probability can be near zero
The Crucible — The Pressure of Decision
- Stakeholder division: buying organizations form divided camps with conflicting priorities, creating a political battleground
- Indecision and fear: many losses are due to inability to commit — not preference for a competitor
- JOLT response: high performers reduce indecision by judging it, offering recommendations, limiting exploration, and taking risk off the table
- Identify the power championEnsure your sponsor has the political capital to push the deal through when momentum fades.
- Focus on loss aversionAddress fear of messing up (FOMU) in addition to fear of missing out (FOMO).
- Limit research late in the cyclePrevent analysis paralysis by keeping the team aligned and focused.
- Control the narrativeFrame the decision as a necessary evolution, not a risky disruption.
Overall Notes & Observations
Print to PDF to save a completed snapshot or share with your pursuit team.